Gaia EDR3 comparative study of protoplanetary disk fractions
in young stellar clusters.

Grant PID2020-112494GBI00 funded by
HomeData retrievalNewsDocumentationCoverage MapCreditsHelp Desk

Documentation

[Table 1]   [Table 2]   [Fig. 1]   [Fig. 2]   [Fig. 3]   [Fig. 4]   [Table A.1]   [Fig. A.1]   [Fig. A.2]   [Fig. A.3]   [Fig. A.4]   [Fig. A.5 ]  

Table 1:
General properties of the young stellar clusters.
Name References Age Massive? Expanding? distance Σ2pc Σ20pc
... ... [Myr] (y/n) (y/n) [pc] [×10-2arcmin-2] [×10-2arcmin-2]
NGC 1333 [1,2,3,4,5,6] 0-2 n n 291±7 1.6 0.052
IC 348 [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] 0-5 n n 314±8 5.4 0.12
NGC 1893 [6] 1-2 n y 2814±302 80 5.9
λ Ori [1,2,4,5,6] 1-11 n 393±8 6.2 0.37
NGC 1960 [7] 15-39†1 n 1131±37 100 2.4
NGC 2169 [8] 6-12 n 943±43 17 0.67
NGC 2244 [1,3,4,6] 0-4 y y 1414±85 57 6.8
NGC 2264 [1,2,4,6,7] 0-6 n n 711±32 31 1.0
NGC 2353 [8] 8-16 n 1187±122 80 4.8
NGC 2362 [1,2,3,4,6,7,8] 0-6 y n 1271±88 110 5.8
γ Vel [|,2,4,6] 0-16 n 359±19 9.7 0.80
ASCC 58 [8] 7-13* n 470±15 3.5 0.35
Tr 15 [4] 4-12 y?†2 y? 2358±261 440 40
NGC 6231 [6,8] 1-9 y n 1588±115 230 15
NGC 6531 [8] 5-10 n 1214±68 96 7.4
NGC 6611 [4,6] 1-4 y y 1602±126 150 16
Tr 37 [1,2,3,4,6] 0-6 y†3 914±32 31 2.3
NGC 7129 [1,2,3,4,6] 0-6 n 915±56 12 0.38
NGC 7160 [1,2,3,4,8] 8-15 n n 920±48 17 1.2

 

Notes: Column 2 lists disk dissipation studies where the clusters in Col. 1 were included. The numbers in Cols 3 and 4 are based on such studies and references therein. The age range is indicated in Col. 3. Following Mamajek (2009) an uncertainty of 30% has been assigned to ages without errorbars. Column 4 indicates whether the cluster has a total stellar mass above or below 500-1000M (yes or not), which is in turn indicative of the presence of a significant number of massive OB stars within the clusters (note, however, that most are part of OB associations when larger scales are considered (Wright 2020). The presence or absence of evidence indicating cluster expansion (yes or not) is indicated in Col. 5, whenever available in Kuhn (2019). The last three columns are based on our work. The average Gaia EDR3 distance (and standard deviation) to each cluster is shown in Col. 6. Columns 7 and 8 show the surface density of member stars for the inner FOV2pc and the whole FOV20pc.

References:
[1]: Hernández et al. (2008),
[2]: Mamajek (2009),
[3]: Muzerolle et al. (2010)
[4]: Pfalzner et al. (2014),
[5]: Ribas et al. (2015),
[6]: Guarcello et al. (2021),
[7]: Haisch et al. (2001),
[8]: Fedele et al. (2010).
†1: Panja et al. (2021).
†2: Wang et al. (2011).
†3: Saurin et al. (2012).

Table 2:
Class II inner disk fractions from 2MASS color-color diagrams.
  FOV20pc FOV2pc
Name NJHK/Nmemb fdiskJHK N JHK/Nmemb (p0) fdiskJHK (p 0) NJHK/Nmemb fdiskJHK N JHK/Nmemb (p0) fdiskJHK (p 0)
NGC 1333 91/95 8.8-1.1+4.4 85/88 (0.2) 9.4 -1.2+3.5 (0.2) 26/28 19.2 -0.0+15.4 26/28 (0.2) 19.2 -0.0+15.4 (0.2)
IC 348 205/209 2.4-0.0+0.5 148/151 (0.6) 0.7 -0.0+0.7 (0.6) 95/97 2.1 -0.0+0.0 81/83 (0.6) 2.5 -0.0+0.0 (0.6)
NGC 1893 52/59 5.8-0.00.0 52/59 (0.5) 5.8 -0.0+0.0 (0.5) 7/8 0.0 -0.0+0.0 7/8 (0.5) 0.0 -0.0+0.0 (0.5)
λ Ori 366/377 4.4-0.8+1.9 31/31 (0.9) 12.9 -0.0+0.0 (0.9) 61/63 3.3 -0.0+3.3 16/16 (0.9) 12.5 -0.0+0.0 (0.9)
NGC 1960 265/273 0.0-0.0+0.0 243/250 (0.8) 0.0 -0.0+0.0 (0.8) 109/114 0.0 -0.0+0.0 106/110 (0.8) 0.0 -0.0+0.0 (0.8)
NGC 2169 98/102 3.1-3.1+0.0 59/62 (0.9) 3.4 -3.4+0.0 (0.9) 23/26 0.0 -0.0+0.0 21/23 (0.9) 0.0 -0.0+0.0 (0.9)
NGC 2244 407/418 6.6-1.5+2.5 140/147 (0.9) 7.9 -1.4+3.6 (0.9) 34/35 8.8 -0.0+0.0 28/28 (0.9) 7.1 -0.0+0.0 (0.9)
NGC 2264 441/452 8.4-1.8+2.0 165/166 (0.8) 13.9 -2.4+1.2 (0.8) 140/142 11.4 -2.9+2.1 91/91 (0.8) 14.3 -4.4+2.2 (0.8)
NGC 2353 530/545 0.2-0.2+1.5 236/243 (0.8) 0.4 -0.4+0.8 (0.8) 87/92 0.0 -0.0+0.0 75/80 (0.8) 0.0 -0.0+0.0 (0.8)
NGC 2362 461/485 2.4-1.1+0.6 162/170 (0.9) 2.5 -1.2+0.6 (0.9) 80/90 2.5 -2.5+1.2 56/63 (0.9) 1.8 -1.8+1.8 (0.9)
γ Vel 780/810 0.6-0.4+2.3 399/415 (0.5) 0.8 -0.5+2.5 (0.5) 94/99 1.1 -0.0+2.1 74/78 (0.5) 0.0 -0.0+2.7 (0.5)
ASCC 58 150/160 0.0-0.0+1.3 112/118 (0.5) 0.0 -0.0+1.8 (0.5) 14/16 0.0 -0.0+0.0 13/15 (0.5) 0.0 -0.0+0.0 (0.5)
Trumpler 15 738/870 4.9-0.8+3.9 167/207 (0.8) 3.6 -1.2+4.2 (0.8) 70/94 2.9 -0.0+1.4 34/49 (0.8) 0.0 -0.0+0.0 (0.8)
NGC 6231 1477/1726 4.1-1.3+4.6 616/714 (0.7) 4.9 -1.3+4.1 (0.7) 225/265 3.6 -1.8+3.6 183/214 (0.7) 2.7 -1.1+3.8 (0.7)
NGC 6531 469/696 7.5-2.8+6.8 282/404 (0.6) 8.2 -2.5+6.0 (0.6) 65/91 6.2 -4.6+4.6 61/83 (0.6) 6.6 -4.9+4.9 (0.6)
NGC 6611 652/809 6.1-2.4+6.9 35/45 (0.99) 5.7 -0.0+2.9 (0.99) 61/72 6.6 -4.9+11.5 19/23 (0.99) 0.0 -0.0+5.3 (0.99)
Trumpler 37 360/381 4.7-1.7+3.1 199/216 (0.4) 7.0 -1.5+3.5 (0.4) 47/52 8.5 -2.1+6.4 38/43 (0.4) 10.5 -2.6+7.9 (0.4)
NGC 7129 42/43 11.9-4.8+2.4 42/43 (0.5) 11.9 -4.8+2.4 (0.5) 13/14 7.7 -0.0+0.0 13/14 (0.5) 7.7 -0.0+0.0 (0.5)
NGC 7160 185/190 1.1-0.5+1.6 171/176 (0.2) 1.2 -0.6+1.8 (0.2) 27/27 0.0 -0.0+0.0 27/27 (0.2) 0.0 -0.0+0.0 (0.2)

 

 

Notes: Columns. 2, 3, 6 and 7: ratio between the number of members with JHK counterparts and the total number of members, and the inner disk fractions (in %) for each cluster and FOV. Rest of the columns: same values for the stars whose membership probability is above a certain threshold p0 (indicated between parentheses). p0 values were arbitrarily set to 0.5, given that the KS test already provided a p-value > 0.05. Listed disk fractions are valid for comparison purposes but should not be taken as absolute values, given the limitations of our study.

Fig. 1: Disk fractions from the compact and extended regions are plotted against each other in the top panel, and their differences in the bottom panel. The red and light green circles are results based on all members identified per cluster or on the high-probability members, respectively. The black dashed lines indicate equal values in both panels, and the mean differences are shown in the bottom panel with red and green dashed lines.

Fig. 2: Membership probability against angular distance to the center of NGC 6231 for all members identified in this cluster (log-scale). The vertical dashed line defines two sub-samples closer and further than 2 pc from the cluster’s center. The horizontal dashed line indicates the probability threshold p 0 below which the KS test rules out that the probability distributions of both previous sub-samples are drawn from the same parent distribution. The resulting high and low probability members are indicated with dark green and orange, respectively.

Fig. 3: Extinction corrected Gaia CMD of NGC 6231, where the high and low probability members are indicated with dark green and orange as identified in Fig. 2. In this case 90% and 91% of the high- and low-probability members are shown, given that extinction values are not available for the rest. The ZAMS loci is indicated with the black solid curve. PMS isochrones and evolutionary tracks are overplotted in black and gray for the stellar ages and masses indicated.

Fig. 4: Mean optical extinction from the stars located closer and further than 2 pc from the center of each cluster are plotted against each other in the top panel (log-scale), and their differences in the bottom panel. The dashed lines indicate equal values in both panels. Standard deviations within each cluster are adopted as errorbars in the top panel. Uncertainties in the bottom panel are derived from the propagation of the individual 1σ deviations. The fraction of member stars for which extinction values from Anders et al. (2022) are available for each cluster is indicated above the arrows in the bottom panel.

Table A.1:
Young Stellar Clusters. Regions and membership.
FOV20pc FOV2pc
Name RAcent DECcent R Nmemb/Ntot π pmRA pmDEC R Nmemb/Ntot π pmRA pmDEC
... (deg) (deg) (') ... (mas) (mas yr-1) (mas yr-1) (') ... (mas) (mas yr-1) (mas yr-1)
NGC 1333 52.2968 31.3097 240 95/43277 3.40±0.08 6.94±0.73 -9.37±0.67 24 28/244 3.39±0.08 7.00±0.80 -9.79±0.46
IC 348 56.0608 32.1560 240 209/53819 3.15±0.08 4.36±0.59 -6.30±0.64 24 97/312 3.14±0.06 4.48±0.53 -6.33±0.52
NGC 1893 80.7237 33.4438 18 59/922 0.32±0.04 -0.30±0.14 -1.41±0.17 1.8 8/22 0.31±0.03 -0.32±0.04 -1.38±0.12
ONC 83.7476 -5.5132 180 1218/30216 2.52±0.05 1.19±0.59 0.06±0.84 18 406/723 2.51±0.05 1.37±0.62 0.18±0.92
λ Ori 83.7802 9.9091 180 377/55430 2.50±0.05 1.14±0.47 -2.06±0.30 18 63/577 2.50±0.05 1.00±0.41 -2.02±0.19
NGC 1960 84.0840 34.1350 60 273/9263 0.85±0.02 -0.21±0.15 -3.39±0.17 6 114/227 0.85±0.02 -0.21±0.14 -3.43±0.13
σ Ori 84.6715 -2.6186 177 1742/30380 2.62±0.18 1.20±0.64 -0.64±0.65 17.7 103/461 2.52±0.11 1.45±0.39 -0.70±0.43
NGC 2169 92.1250 13.9510 70 102/10500 1.03±0.04 -1.25±0.25 -1.58±0.17 7 26/153 1.03±0.04 -1.10±0.13 -1.59±0.12
NGC 2244 97.9817 4.9390 44 418/4255 0.68±0.04 -1.65±0.38 0.39±0.41 4.4 35/75 0.67±0.04 -1.75±0.21 0.35±0.21
NGC 2264 100.2471 9.8755 120 452/32665 1.37±0.06 -1.78±0.38 -3.68±0.29 12 142/242 1.38±0.05 -1.68±0.30 -3.68±0.22
NGC 2353 108.6242 -10.2711 60 545/11452 0.82±0.08 -1.05±0.43 0.77±0.38 6 92/206 0.84±0.05 -1.09±0.16 0.76±0.20
NGC 2362 109.6658 -24.9557 52 485/12410 0.76±0.05 -2.61±0.46 2.93±0.39 5.2 90/212 0.77±0.03 -2.75±0.21 2.98±0.20
γ Vel 122.3831 -47.3366 180 810/134095 2.76±0.14 -6.20±0.44 9.08±0.64 18 99/1364 2.87±0.12 -6.48±0.40 9.53±0.56
ASCC 58 153.8180 -55.0003 120 160/99215 2.11±0.07 -13.42±0.48 2.70±0.38 12 16/1068 2.08±0.03 -13.32±0.31 2.71±0.28
Trumpler 15 161.1743 -59.3664 26 870/6216 0.40±0.04 -6.31±0.35 2.14±0.31 2.6 94/139 0.39±0.03 -6.13±0.21 2.08±0.18
NGC 6231 253.5356 -41.8284 60 1726/26977 0.60±0.04 -0.64±0.32 -2.12±0.38 6 265/546 0.60±0.04 -0.58±0.21 -2.19±0.22
NGC 6531 271.0576 -22.4935 55 696/15689 0.79±0.04 0.50±0.34 -1.46±0.34 5.5 91/257 0.80±0.04 0.54±0.21 -1.42±0.22
NGC 6611 274.6993 -13.8090 40 809/7796 0.59±0.05 0.16±0.53 -1.63±0.58 4 72/133 0.56±0.04 0.20±0.31 -1.66±0.27
Trumpler 37 324.7486 57.4782 73 381/18293 1.07±0.04 -2.43±0.52 -4.28±0.75 7.3 52/290 1.07±0.04 -2.43±0.33 -4.47±0.62
NGC 7129 325.7401 66.1140 60 43/8627 1.07±0.06 -1.77±0.33 -3.41±0.39 6 14/63 1.10±0.04 -1.77±0.18 -3.45±0.32
NGC 7160 328.4142 62.6020 72 190/20532 1.06±0.05 -3.42±0.23 -1.44±0.34 7.2 27/213 1.09±0.04 -3.51±0.19 -1.38±0.18

 

 

Notes.
Columns 1 to 3 list the name of the cluster and the coordinates of its central position. Columns 4 to 8 refer to FOV20pc, listing the associated angular radius, number of members identified divided by the total number of sources within the FOV having Gaia EDR3 proper motions and reliable parallaxes (as defined in Sect.2.1), and inferred mean parallax and proper motions. The rest of the columns are equivalent to the previous, but related to FOV2pc.

Fig. A.1.


Proper motion distributions for the different clusters where the field stars within FOV20pc having absolute proper motions ≤ 75 mas yr-1 and the member stars are indicated in black and yellow, respectively. The top left sub-panels focus on the proper motions of the members, where the blue and red circles correspond to those identified within FOV20pc and FOV2pc, respectively. Typical (mean) uncertainties in proper motions are ~ 0.04 mas yr-1, roughly comparable to the size of such circles for most cases.
(You can click on each image to see a full size version).

Fig. A.2.


Sky projections (North to the top and East to the left) for the different clusters where the blue and red arrows indicate the directions of motion of all members identified within FOV20pc and FOV2pc, respectively.
(You can click on each image to see a full size version).

Fig. A.3.


Sky projections for the different clusters where the yellow squares indicate the positions of all members identified within FOV20pc and FOV2pc, whose corresponding sizes are indicated with the blue and red circles, respectively. Background images are colored according to the ALLWISE W1, W2, and W4 bands (except for Trumpler 15, NGC 6231, NGC 6531, and NGC 6611, where 2MASS images are used for a better visualization).
(You can click on each image to see a full size version).

Fig. A.4.


JHK color-color diagrams for the different clusters. In each panel, the solid line represents the expected position of non- extincted MS stars in the diagram, and the dashed lines the direction of the extinction vector and thus the rough boundaries for extincted MS stars (crosses within the dashed lines indicate an optical extinction increase of 5 magnitudes). Sources located to the right of the right hand dashed lines and within the dotted lines are considered disk stars. Inner disk fractions are indicated in the legends, as inferred from all identified members within FOV20pc and within FOV2pc (blue and red symbols, respectively).
(You can click on each image to see a full size version).

Fig. A.5.


Extinction corrected Gaia CMDs for the different clusters. The ZAMS loci is indicated with the black solid curve. PMS isochrones and evolutionary tracks from (Bressan et al. 2012) are overplotted in black and gray for the stellar ages and masses indicated. The representativeness of the diagrams is limited to the fraction of all members identified within FOV20pc and FOV2pc having optical extinction estimates in Anders et al. (2022), which is indicated in the legends.
(You can click on each image to see a full size version).
This service uses SVOCat by the SVO
SVO Privacy Policy